Level of Concurrent and you can Life FWB Couples

Level of Concurrent and you can Life FWB Couples

Show

Most participants indicated current involvement in only one FWB relationship (M = 1.39, SD = 1.03). Specifically, 76% of participants indicated having just one FWB partner, 16% had two, and 8% had three or more. Although the majority of participants seemed to suggest exclusive involvement with just one FWB partner, these data indicate that a sizeable minority did not practice monogamy in their FWB relationships. Also, supporting our hypothesis about sex differences in number of current FWB partners, results of an https://datingranking.net/cs/meetme-recenze/ analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that men reported significantly more numerous concurrent FWB partners (M = 1.64, SD = 1.18) than women (M = 1.31, SD = 0.97), F(1, 404) = 7.99, p < .01.

With regard to the total number of FWB relationships participants have had in their lifetime, the average was 4.80 (SD = 6.84). Consistent with the aforementioned finding that men were likely to have more concurrent FWB partners than women, men also indicated having had more FWB partners in their lifetime (M = 7.44, SD = ) compared to women (M = 3.91, SD = 4.08), F(1, 402) = , p < .001.

Matchmaking Initiation

In terms of reasons for starting a FWB relationship, both sex (60%) and emotional connection (35%) were cited with relative frequency, consistent with expectations. In fact, the vast majority of participants (77%) indicated that one or both motives played a role in starting their FWB relationship. To examine sex differences in reasons for beginning such relationships, the dichotomous relationship initiation variables were submitted to chi-square analyses. Results indicated that men (72%) were more likely than women (56%) to cite a desire for sex as a primary motivator, ? 2 (1, N = 411) = 8.07, p < .01. In contrast, women (37%) were more likely than men (25%) to cite a desire for emotional connection as a primary motivator, ? 2 (1, N = 411) = 5.35, p < .05. These findings are consistent with our predictions that men and women would differ in terms of how frequently they reported sexual and emotional connection motives as reasons for beginning their FWB relationships.

Dating Relationship

With respect to FWB commitment, participants appeared to be relatively strongly committed to both the friendship (M = 6.47, SD = 2.29) and to the sexual relationship (M = 5.63, SD = 2.40), with both means appearing above the midpoint of the scale. A paired t test revealed that, overall, participants reported significantly greater commitment to the friendship than to the sexual relationship, t(406) = 7.57, p < .001.

Second, between-intercourse reviews was conducted to decide whether dedication to the fresh sexual and you can friendship aspects of the relationship differed for men and lady. For the newest friendship, though lady (Yards = six.57, SD = 2.26) evidenced a sophisticated away from partnership than men (Meters = six.19, SD = 2.35), results of an ANOVA indicated that which differences wasn’t tall, F(step one, 407) = 2.09, ns. Concurrently, for the fresh intimate dating, even when males (M = 5.86, SD = 2.19) got large amounts of partnership than female (M = 5.55, SD = 2.46), outcome of an ANOVA indicated that it differences wasn’t significant, F(step 1, 405) = step one.twenty five, ns. Therefore, although the trend out-of way for each type out-of union fell regarding the requested guidance, the newest statistical overall performance failed to help our very own hypotheses.

We then conducted within-sex comparisons to determine whether commitment to the friendship was stronger or weaker than commitment to the sexual aspect of the relationship within each sex. As hypothesized, results of a paired t test revealed that women were significantly more committed to the friendship compared to the sexual aspect of their FWB relationship, t(306) = 7.45, p < .001. Contrary to expectations, a paired t test revealed that men were also more committed to the friendship compared to the sexual aspect of their FWB relationship, t(101) = 1.99, p < .05.